Mission Delores

© Beth Spencer

Mission Delores

Uploaded: July 14, 2012

Description

Canon 40 D, Tamron 18-270mm Lens, f/5.0, 0.3sec, ISO 800

Exif: F Number: 5.6, Exposure Bias Value: 0.00, ExposureTime: 3/10 seconds, Flash: reserved, ISO: 800, White balance: Auto white balance, FocalLength: 42.00 mm, Model: Canon EOS 40D

Comments

Beth Spencer July 14, 2012

This is for Dale's Challenge, I used bleach by pass and detil extractor filters in Color Effex Po. Here is also one of the top of the mission. #1474870

Stephen Shoff July 15, 2012

Nice off-center placement, Beth. I like the color tones overall, but on my laptop the colors seem muddy. There are a couple of spotlights showing along the lower right margin that are a distraction and could be cloned out. #10229774

Jeff E Jensen July 15, 2012

Yeah, I like the off-centered placement.

I also agree that the colors in the first image are a bit on the muddy side. #10230825

Rita K. Connell level-classic July 16, 2012

great find for the month challenge beth, I agree the colors a little off looks like a beautiful church. #10231449

Beth Spencer July 16, 2012

Thanks, this was taken in San Francisco when I was visiting my sister. The top of this picture was really red, I think from the light through all the stained glass windows.
I tried to adjust the color not sure if it is better, I put the filters on it to give it an older look, hence all the grain. #10231641

Beth Spencer July 16, 2012

I guess the photo would help. #10231644

Stephen Shoff July 16, 2012

It might be the filter itself that seems to not quite work for me, Beth. The colors in both versions, tho' quite different, are very pleasing.

The cloning helped quite a bit. #10231974

Michael Kelly level-classic July 16, 2012

I agree great POV and comp, but the shot looks off. I would try it without the filter to see if that is the problem. #10232305

Beth Spencer July 16, 2012

I started over and this is what I came up with! #10232566

Aimee C. Eisaman July 17, 2012

Wow...very low light you were working with in this image. My take on the colors are that I would blend your first post and the second one so that the top of the image was from the second post (except the stained glass window). You would have to blend it well to make it look right by using a large soft eraser or brush if you are using a layer mask. :~) #10233220

Michael Kelly level-classic July 17, 2012

I like it much better whiteout the filters. You captured a much cleaner look. I think the colors and architecture are very interesting. #10233431

Debbie E. Payne July 17, 2012

I agree that the colors you captured in the original are much better. The contrast is also much better. Filters are fun and oftentimes necessary but it takes time and practice to determine what a certain image needs or doesn't need. playing around is a good thing and yes, sometimes starting all over is what is needed. Great find of a building. Thanks for telling us where it I and what the name of the church was. I am so sorry not to see you nd your husband in DC. Am anxious to find out where and when will be the next meet-up. #10233663

Debbie E. Payne July 17, 2012

San Francisco would be an awesome place to visit. And taking in the wine countr or Carmel wouldn't be bad either. #10233665

Anthony L. Mancuso July 18, 2012

I prefer the filterless shot as well..I think you could open up the shadows in it a little bit though.. #10234590

Beth Spencer July 18, 2012

Debbie, I was hoping to get to meet you and your husband, how is he doing and what happened to you.
Thanks for your comments, I am still learning the filters and trying to play with them.
Tony and Aimee, I work again tomorrow, so I will try tomorrow night or the next day,
Thanks Michael, it was a very beautiful church. Last time I was in California, my sister took me to the mission in Carmel, that one is really cool also... #10235640

To discuss, first log in or sign up (buttons are at top center of page).

Get Constructive Critiques

Sign up for an interactive online photography course to get critiques on your photos.


 

Did You Know?

Discussions by Category: You can view photo discussions on various themes in the Community > Photo Discussions section of the site.

BetterPhoto Websites: If you see an orange website link directly under the photographer's name, it's totally okay. It's not spam. The reason: BetterPhoto is the one that offers these personal photography websites. We are supporting our clients with those links.

Unavailable EXIF: If there is no other information but 'Unavailable' in the EXIF (meaning no EXIF data exists with the photo), the 'Unavailable' blurb is not displayed. If there is any info, it shows. Many photos have the EXIF stripped out when people modify the image and resave it, before uploading.


 

The following truth is one of the core philosophies of BetterPhoto:

I hear, I forget.
I see, I remember.
I do, I understand.

You learn by doing. Take your next online photography class.


Copyright for this photo belongs solely to Beth Spencer.
Images may not be copied, downloaded, or used in any way without the expressed, written permission of the photographer.
Log in to follow or message this photographer or report this photo.