BetterPhoto Q&A
Category: Film-Based Camera Equipment

Photography Question 

BetterPhoto Member
 

Help with buying a new lens for Canon Rebel G


I would like to take a photo of an eagle for a contest I will be entering and the lenses that I have do not get a close enough shot from far away. I am looking to buy a lens for my Canon Rebel G. I need it for getting far away shots of Eagles. I have a lens that goes to 300mm and I just got a doubler, do you have any suggestions? I don't even know where to start. Obviously I would like to get the most quality for my money, I am expecting to pay between $500-$1000.00 for the lens. What are the things I should look out for? Are there lenses within these price ranges that are far superior than others?
Is there a reprutable place or places that might carry what I am looking for online you would suggest shopping with over the others?
Thank you,
Dawn


To love this question, log in above
January 24, 2005

 

Jon Close
  70-300 f/4-5.6 zooms tend to be a bit "soft" in resolution when zoomed to 300. Adding a 2x teleconverter exacerbates it, plus losing 2 stops of light (effectively f/11 at the long end) which can make autofocus impossible.

500mm or 600mm f/4 are the preferred lens for "birding" but are frightfully expensive.

"Economy" solutions include:

EF 300 f/4L IS USM (new ~$1100. The older non-IS version is as good or sharper if you can find it used). Image stabilization is a big plus with long teles. Very sharp optics. With 1.4x TC (most will degrade image far less than will a 2x) becomes 420 f/5.6, with 2x TC 600 f/8.

EF 400 f/5.6L USM (new ~$1050) No IS, but greater reach and very sharp (sharper than 300 f/4 + 1.4x combo). Add 1.4x TC for 560 f/8, 2x = 800 f/11.

Sigma 50-500 f/4-6.3 EX HSM (new ~$1000) AKA "Bigma", it's pretty good at the long end, despite being a 10x zoom. Has a better reputation for sharpness than the Sigma 170-500 f/5-6.3 (~$650) or Sigma 135-400 f/4.5-5.6 APO (~$550)

Tamron 200-500 f/5-6.3 Di LD (~$900) was recently introduced. I've only seen this review so far. Price/performance puts it between typical 70-300 and 500 f/4.5L. Don't know if it's better or worse than Sigma 50-500.

Otherwise the most economical way to get 500mm is with a mirror (aka Reflex) lens. Ranging from ~$110 (Vivitar 500 f/8 Mirror) to $400 (Sigma 600 f/8 Reflex). Very compact and light, these can be very sharp (though assembly/alignment quality varies). Drawbacks are: manual focus only, non-adjustable f/8 aperture (can only use in Av or M modes), and out-of-focus highlights are rendered as doughnut shapes instead of flat disks.

Personal favorites for internet shopping are B&H Photo (new and used) and KEH (used), but others are good too. Check http://www.resellerratings.com, especially when the price is "too good to be true" (you'll find you're right).


To love this comment, log in above
January 24, 2005

 
This old forum is now archived. Use improved Forum here

Report this Thread